Would Tom Kneen’s JPK 11.80 Sunrise have still won the Rolex Fastnet Race 2021 if it had been sailed on the old course, with Plymouth rather than Cherbourg as the finish? Imponderable it may be, but it’s a question of renewed interest as the row rumbles on about the in-race shortening of the recent Rolex Middle Sea Race 2021.
This course shortening was done in view of a developing northeasterly storm which soon made the harbour-mouth finish dangerously impossible for smaller boats still at sea. But as everyone is now well aware, it meant that Sunrise – already finished and in port along with two-thirds of the fleet – had to make do with second overall, after looking for a while as though she was about to achieve the magnificent double of Fastnet and Middle Sea overall victories in one season, achieved with such style that it would all have been done and dusted within the space of three months.
But the unhappy outcome instead caused an almighty row, and some of us sought shelter in trying to analyse it from a different point of view. The affable but very keen and obviously extremely effective Tom Kneen is a loyal member of the Royal Western Yacht Club in Plymouth, and he happily admitted that in the RORC members’ poll about the change to the Fastnet course, he had voted in favour of the traditional finish in Plymouth rather than race the extra 90 miles to a new big-scale welcome in Cherbourg.
Ironically, it may well be that the extra 90 miles “imposition” gave Sunrise her clearcut win. She had been reasonably well-placed but not winning at earlier stages, thus it was the lengthened final stage after the Bishop Rock and up the middle of the English Channel in a private breeze – a feat repeated with almost equal success by Ronan O Siochru’s Desert Star from Dun Laoghaire – which saw Sunrise get so clearly into the Glitter Zone.
But having been given a portal to overall success by the long-planned extension of the Fastnet Race, Sunrise then found the door to a Middle Sea repeat slammed shut in her face by the sudden imposition of a course shortening. Some may raise their eyes to heaven and say: “The Lord Giveth, the Lord Taketh Away”. But the more grounded have raised – not for the first time – the question of whether well-meaning amateurs should have ultimate control of the running of any major event in which the combined long-term expense of involvement by a huge fleet – whether amateur or professional – is a figure running into tens and probably hundreds of millions of euro.
Instinctively, many of us will incline to the support of the enthusiastic amateurs. But the harsher judges will quote Damon Runyon who, on enquiring about the activities of one of his Manhattan acquaintances, was told that: “He is doing the best he can”, to which Runyon responded that he found this to be a very over-crowded profession.
The voluntary race administrators in the Royal Malta Yacht Club came in for huge flak and this week issued what is in effect a mea culpa and a promise to do better in future. But it’s going to rumble on like the Palme volcano for some time yet, and just yesterday Peter Ryan, the Chairman of ISORA, suggested they should now declare two sets of results as though they’d been running two races of different lengths in parallel all along, which if nothing else would lead to dancing in the streets in the Silversmiths’ Quarter in Valetta.
And there have been suggestions that the RORC “should consider its position in relation to the Middle Sea Race”, which is polite-speak for saying that the RORC should at least think about withdrawing its active support from what is essentially the Royal Malta YC’s premier event. But nothing happens in a vacuum, and people making this extreme proposal are failing to take note that there’s a turf war (ridiculous to have a turf war at sea, but there you are) going on between the ORC and the IRC measurement systems.
The IRC is very much identified with the RORC, while the ORC has its own setup. And even as quiet territorial expansions are taking place on various fronts with new events emanating from both camps – the interesting Finnish-connected RORC race in the Baltic is one example – a proposed marriage between the World Championships of both systems appears to have resulted in the IRC being left stranded at the altar without a word of explanation.
In this febrile atmosphere, were the RORC to dump on the Royal Malta, it’s always possible that the ORC’s organisation might step into the breach, for the Middle Sea Race now has a momentum and vitality of its own, and it will happen each year regardless of politicking ashore.
A public spat online was inevitable, and in time we’ll be persuaded that it has cleared the air, for that’s the way these things happen even if various waters are temporarily muddied. But in global sailing, however big the row, it will only have been in the ha’penny place by comparison with the controversies which are now in the DNA of the America’s Cup, which has been a joy and delight for m’learned friends ever since the original hand-written Deed of Gift – inkily scratched on parchment in 1857 – went on to become a Protocol in 1882 which was then revised in 1887.
In Ireland, we may well be suffering from Protocol Fatigue these days, but regardless of our feelings, the long-awaited Protocol for the next staging of the America’s Cup – AC37 – will be revealed on Wednesday, November 17th by defenders Team New Zealand and the Challenger of Record, Royal Yacht Squadron Racing Ltd.
Doubtless, there’ll be many bumps in the road between now and then, just as there have been bumps to the point of chasms in getting to where they are now. It’s an uneven progress, with the professional/amateur divide still involved to such an extent that when the New York Yacht Club recently announced that they were “passing” on direct club participation this time around, in a subsequent statement the New Zealanders described the NYYC Commodore as a “Corinthian”.
This is normally a term of approval, but there was a distinct feeling that approval was not the intention in this case. In addition to the increasingly complex legalities, it made things personal, and that is not a good place to be in a situation like this.
But then this “situation” has become a world of its own. So much so, in fact, that the America’s Cup legalities have provided the makings of its own department in the University of Auckland, and it has already graduated its own PhD in the shape of Dr Hamish Ross, who published his latest findings this week. You’ve probably read it already, but even so, it’s a good browse for a November Saturday morning:
In eleven days’ time, the Protocol for the 37th America’s Cup is due to be revealed, eight months after Royal Yacht Squadron Racing Limited filed a notice challenge under the Deed of Gift.
What can we expect and what is likely to be left unanswered?
Sources close to the Defender indicate that the all-important venue selection is yet to be made and may not be announced until as late as March 2022. This will not be welcome news to the Challenger of Record, who will be getting impatient. It has a right to fall back onto the Deed default match terms if relations become strained, which will likely result in a commercial black hole.
Given the selected venue may impact the yacht to be raced, publication of the Class Rule may be similarly delayed, although it was at least agreed last March, that it would be in the AC75 class used in Auckland. There are always refinements to be made. If there is a meaningful push towards costs savings, as has been…
Read More:Sailing’s Public Spats – Do They Clear The Air Or Muddy The Waters?